August 13, 2007 – 11:29 pm
Tiger Woods won the PGA Championship this weekend, giving him a total of 13 victories in major championships for his career. I was able to watch him play almost every one of his last 54 holes, and I think I know the most impressive part of his victory.
The cop-out answer is to say the round of 63 he shot on Friday, which tied the record for the lowest score ever in a single round of a major championship. Don’t get me wrong, that’s extremely impressive. But I think even more impressive than that is the fact that in the two rounds of golf following that monster, he didn’t give up a single stroke. He shot 69-69 coming in, going two more strokes below par.
Do you know how unbelievable that is? I’d love to see this data: take each of the other players who have shot 63 in a major championship, and tell me what they scored in their next round. It is so terribly common to follow up a great round with a below average one. It’s got to take so much energy and effort to go so low below par, and then add on the pressure of knowing you have to defend that lead over two more rounds, and you get what I think is the most impressive part of Tiger’s win.
And I keep hearing the conversation, which becomes increasingly common as time goes on, that some people are having reservations that Tiger has never won a major championship when he wasn’t leading going into the final round. The argument goes something like, “Sure, he can play with a lead, but what happens when he’s forced to catch up and overtake someone?”
First, the guy has won 13 major championships. No one has any room whatsoever for criticizing how Tiger wins or doesn’t win these things. He’s one of the ten greatest winners in the history of American sports, period. And his career isn’t half over.
Second, do you think the field just hands Tiger a lead over the first three rounds? Do they not play Thursday through Saturday? They just show up on Sunday, and like gentlemen agree Tiger should be spotted two or three strokes, and we’ll just play from there. Bullsh*t. Tiger smashes the field for three days, gets a lead, and then protects it. It sounds like a pretty good plan to me.
I also think people casually dismiss the last part of that equation: protecting the lead. Do you know how difficult that is? Do you know how difficult it is to play a whole round of golf, with that kind of pressure, and not give a single stroke back? It’s incredible. It’s almost like Tiger can say, “You know what, I’m not going to go for birdie on this hole. I’ll just settle for par.” And 90% of the time, he gets his par, or ends up birdy-ing the hole anyway. It’s just unbelievable.
So I guess the point to all this is just to say “shut up” if you have any criticism about the way Tiger is doing anything relative to the game of golf. He’s in the Jack Nicklaus/Michael Jordan/Joe Montana area where you recognize they simply win more than almost anyone else who has played their game, and you enjoy watching it while it lasts.
Posted in Golf | No Comments »